The 2016 Retina Macbook 12 inch (1.2GHz Core M5) achieves a Geekbench score 16% to 23% higher than the 2015 Retina MacBook (1.2GHz Core M). ( HIGHEST number in Megabytes per Second = FASTEST ) Using a 4G test size, we measured the PCIe flash storage sequential transfer speed. The OVERALL 64-bit score is a combination of integer, floating-point, and memory performance. MacBook 2015 1.2 = 'early 2015' MacBook Retina 12 inch (2304x1440) IPS screen, 1.2GHz Core M processor, Intel HD Graphics 5300, 512GB PCIe based flash storage, 8G of 1600MHz LPDDR3 memory, OS X 10.11 MacBook 2016 1.1 = 'early 2016' MacBook Retina 12 inch (2304x1440) IPS screen, 1.1GHz Core M3 processor, Intel HD Graphics 515, 256GB PCIe based flash storage, 8G of 1866MHz LPDDR3 memory, OS X 10.11 MacBook 2016 1.2 = 'early 2016' MacBook Retina 12 inch (2304x1440) IPS screen, 1.2GHz Core M5 processor, Intel HD Graphics 515, 512GB PCIe based flash storage, 8G of 1866MHz LPDDR3 memory, OS X 10.11 MacBook 2016 1.3 = 'early 2016' MacBook Retina 12 inch (2304x1440) IPS screen, 1.3GHz Core M7 processor, Intel HD Graphics 515, 512GB PCIe based flash storage, 8G of 1866MHz LPDDR3 memory, OS X 10.11 We wanted to serve up an appetizer of performance data on the 'early 2016' MacBook Retina 12-inch versus the 'early 2015' MacBook Retina 12-inch and the Razer Blade Stealth UHD, a worthy surrogate for competing Windows thin, light, 12 inch laptops.īlade Stealth 12.5' = 'early 2016' Razer Blade Stealth UHD, 12.5 inch (3940x2160) IGZO screen, 2.5GHz Core i7-6500U processor, Intel HD Graphics 520, 512GB PCIe based flash storage, 8G of 1866MHz LPDDR3 memory Windows 10

Posted April 21st, 2016 by rob-ART morgan, mad scientistĪppended on April 28th, 2016, with 1.1GHz and 1.3GHz MacBook 2016 results

2015 macbook vs 2016 macbook